Songs › Grateful Dead › Eyes of the World

Grateful Dead

Eyes of the World

Wake of the Flood · 1973 · Jerry Garcia / Robert Hunter

GLI34
Garcia Leaning
Confidence 90% · evidence quality, not position
Grateful DeadPhotograph loading from archive
Jerry Garcia and Mickey Hart on stage at Red Rocks, 11 August 1987.
Mark L. Knowles (User:Grateful Dead) · CC BY-SA 3.0

A written song designed with the doors left open.

GARCIAPerformance creates the music
DEAD CENTERNeither wins
LENNONComposition creates the music

Hollow marks: the other 49 scored songs · Hatched band: the Crossover Zone

The case

The strongest honest argument for each side, then the ruling.

The Garcia argument

The studio track runs 5:16. Live versions routinely ran two or three times that, and the extra length is improvised: long solos between the verses and an open ending that hands off to whatever came next. No two performances have the same shape.

The Lennon argument

The verse and chorus are fully written, with one of Hunter's most quoted refrains, and the chord sequence under the solos does not change. Garcia improvises over the form the way a jazz player does over a standard. The melody and lyric are sung the same way every time.

The verdict: GLI 34

A composed song that was built to be opened up. The solo sections are part of the design, their length is not, and the ending is a handoff. More of its identity is written down than in Playing in the Band, and less than in Truckin'.

What is fixed

  • Verse and chorus melody
  • Lyric
  • Chord sequence under the solos

What is open

  • Length of each solo
  • The ending and where it leads
  • Tempo, which moved over the years

Evidence dimensions

Each runs from 0, Garcia, to 100, Lennon. Their weighted composite is 33. The published GLI is 34, 1 higher after comparison with neighbouring songs. The allowed margin is 6.

Structural FixityHow much of sequence, form and duration is settled beforehand?
40
ElasticFixed

Verse and chorus are fixed. The solo sections and the ending have no set length.

Performance ConsistencyHow far can two performances differ and still be the same work?
30
TransformativeReproducible

Live versions routinely run two or three times the 5:16 of the record.

PredeterminationHow much of what matters exists before the performance begins?
36
EmergentPredetermined

Melody, lyric and changes are written. The solos between them carry much of each performance.

Development MethodHow does the music move forward?
28
ExploratoryComposed

Improvised solos over a fixed sequence, closer to a jazz standard than to free playing.

Recording SpecificityDoes the recording document an occurrence, or define the object?
32
Documents eventDefines work

The studio cut is a short reading of a song that lived on stage.

Transformational tolerance

It keeps its identity through large changes of length and tempo because the song and the changes hold.

Confidence: 90%

381 documented performances. The claims about how the arrangement changed over time still need a dated source.

Keep arguing

Every placement is relative. These are the songs this one was measured against.

The record

  • The studio track on Wake of the Flood runs 5:16.Source ↗
  • Played 381 times between February 1973 and July 1995.Source ↗

Catalog facts

Catalog no.
GLI·GD·004
Artist
Grateful Dead
Writers
Jerry Garcia / Robert Hunter
Release
Wake of the Flood (1973)
Released
15 October 1973
Duration
5:16
Performed
381 times (dead.net); 382 per setlist.fm
First played
9 February 1973
Last played
6 July 1995

Sources

Classified 5 October 2026